In-Vitro Evaluation Study of Extended Release Matrix Tablet of Ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin
1Research Scholar, P. Wadhwani College of Pharmacy, Yavatmal (M. S.)
2Professor, P. Wadhwani College of Pharmacy, Yavatmal (M. S.)
*Corresponding Author E-mail: raj_mujoriya@live.com
ABSTRACT:
A floating extended release formulation of a broad-spectrum antibiotics containing ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin have been prepared by a unique blend of polymer (HPMC) matrix, NaHCO3 (Sodium bicarbonate) and other excipients in a optimized ratio to achieve an extended or delayed drug release profile up to 12 hours without any chemical interaction between drug and excipients. A unique blend of polymer matrix has been made by two different grades (K4M-low viscosity and K15M-high viscosity) of 'hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose' (HPMC) in an optimized ratio of 1: 35.66 (HPMC K4M: HPMC K15M) to reach the targeted drug release profile. The in vitro dissolution study shows that the floating tablets are capable of drug release over a period of 12 hours. The treated data are fitted into various kinetic models and R2 values are evaluated. The analysis shows that the drug release from the floating matrix followed Higuchi release kinetics more preferably. As the “n” (release exponent) values of Krosmeyer- Pappes model of most of the formulation batch are in the range of 0.5 – 0.89 and 0.89- 1.0.
KEYWORDS: Floating extended release formulation, ciprofloxacin, Amoxicillin, Higuchi release kinetics, Krosmeyer- Pappes model.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Oral route is the most preferable and convenient route for drug administration to any other route of drug administration. Therefore, formulation scientists have been focusing on controlled release oral drug delivery systems for last few decades. So, the main aim is to prolong the time for drug administration from the small intestine. Oral dosage forms have to stay in-side the stomach or upper intestine for desired period of time so that entire drug can be released from the dosage forms.
Gastro-retentive systems confine the dosage forms for several hours in-side the stomach and considerably prolong the gastric residence time of drugs. Prolonged gastric retention improves bioavailability, reduces drug waste, and improves solubility for drugs that are less soluble in a high pH environment. It is also beneficial for local drug delivery to the stomach and proximal small intestines. Gastro retention helps to provide better availability of new products with new therapeutic possibilities and substantial benefits for patients1-2.
Present Study was done to prepare the optimize formulation of Broad Spectrum Antibiotics containing Ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin to Give Combination Treatment for multiple infection diseases. Mechanism of Action of ciprofloxacin results from inhibition of the enzymes topoisomerase II (DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase IV (both Type II topoisomerases), which are required for bacterial DNA replication, transcription, repair, and recombination. Amoxicillin acts through the inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis that leads to the death of the bacteria.3,4,5. As half-life of both drugs is very less which require the frequent administration. (Half-life of ciprofloxacin is 3.5 hrs whereas half-life of amoxicillin is only 1 hrs). Present Study was done to prepare the extended release matrix tablet of broad spectrum antibiotics to minimize the frequent administration of Tablet.
2. MATERIAL AND METHOD:
Ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin was obtained as gift Sample from Anazeal Research Lab Mumbai, HPMC K4M, HPMC K15M was obtain from Mahalaxmi Chemicals, Hyderabad, Sodium bicarbonate, citric Acid and Mg Stearate was also obtained from Mahalaxmi Chemicals, Hyderabad. Other al chemicals used are of Analytical Grades.
3. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS:
3.1 Methodology of the Experiment:
The project leads to a method for preparing an extended release tablet formulation of Ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin. A unique blend of matrix system was used as a base for retarded release of drug. Two different grades of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC K4M and HPMC K15M) were mixed in different ratio to obtain a suitable matrix system for achieving the extended release profile of the said antibiotic6,7. Statistical analysis was done by the help of Design Expert 8.0.0.0 software. There are three independable variables and six responses in the formulation designing process.
3.2 Preformulation Study:
Preformulation testing is the first step in the rational development of dosage forms of drug substances. It can be defined as an investigation of physical and chemical properties of a drug substance alone and when combined with excipients. The overall objective of reformulations testing is to generate information useful to the formulator in developing stable and bioavailable dosage forms that can be mass produced.
3.3 FTIR spectroscopic analysis:
3.4 Formulation Development:
Formulation was developed by using HPMC K 4 M to enhance the drug release, HPMC K 15M use for retarded release of drug useful for Extended release of Drugs from Tablet. NaHCO3 (Sodium bicarbonate) is used in the tablet formulation of Antibiotics as a floating agent as well as to retain the tablet dosage form of Antibiotics by maintaining a optimized floating lag time (FLT) and total floating time (TFT) in the stomach, without disturbing the drug release profile. A fixed concentration of citric acid is used to increase the floating ability of Sodium bicarbonate8-9.
3.5 Preparation of tablet formulation of the above-mentioned batches:
At first all ingredients (HPMC K4M, HPMCK 15 M, Drugs and NaHCO3) are mixed by geometric dilution. Citric acid is dissolved by 4 ml ethanol in a Petri-dish. Then the mixture is mixed with the citric acid associated with ethanol to prepare a kindle like mass. Then Granules are prepared by 16 mesh and subsequently followed by 24 mesh sieves. After that the granules are subjected to drying in hot air oven until 5% moisture retains. After optimum drying the prepared granules are ready for punch in tablet punching machine10.
Fig. 1. FTIR spectra of Ciprofloxacin
Fig. 2. FT-IR spectrum of Amoxicillin
Table: 1 Formulation Development
Components |
Amount (mg) |
Percentage |
Drugs, Ciprofloxacin (150 mg) and Amoxicillin (100 mg) |
250 |
50 |
Undependable variables (HPMC K4, HPMC K15 and NaHCO3) |
235 |
47 |
Citric acid |
10 |
2 |
Mg-Stearate |
5 |
1 |
4. EVALUATION:
In-vitro Evaluation Studies:
Table 2: Evaluation of targeted parameters of prepared formulation batches for Ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin:
Formulation Code |
FLT (min) |
TFT (hours) |
CPR 2h (%) |
CPR 4h (%) |
CPR 8h (%) |
CPR 12h (%) |
|
1 |
12 |
27.16 |
46.43 |
79.78 |
99.25 |
2 |
1 |
12 |
24.71 |
45.24 |
78.41 |
97.52 |
3 |
1 |
12 |
16.32 |
34.21 |
67.42 |
95.55 |
F |
1.5 |
12 |
29.28 |
48.72 |
82.58 |
100.92 |
F |
1.2 |
12 |
27.64 |
47.25 |
80.71 |
100.28 |
F |
1.2 |
12 |
17.76 |
35.3 |
74.98 |
95.93 |
F7 |
1.5 |
12 |
29.37 |
48.72 |
82.34 |
100.52 |
F8 |
1.2 |
12 |
20.73 |
40.82 |
76.69 |
97.35 |
9 |
1.5 |
12 |
14.98 |
30.81 |
60.3 |
80.83 |
F10 |
1 |
12 |
27.15 |
46.04 |
79.77 |
99.28 |
F11 |
1 |
12 |
15.23 |
31.06 |
61.51 |
85.57 |
F12 |
1.5 |
12 |
18.34 |
36.73 |
76.07 |
96.23 |
F13 |
1.5 |
12 |
14.95 |
30.71 |
60.33 |
81.16 |
F14 |
1.2 |
12 |
15.79 |
33.77 |
65.42 |
92.55 |
Table 3: Regression analysis of release kinetic data
Formulation Code |
Kinetic Model |
||||
Zero order |
1st order |
Higuchi |
Korsemeyer- Peppas |
||
|
R2 Value |
R2 Value |
R2 Value |
R2 |
n |
F1 |
0.9808 |
0.9184 |
0.9974 |
0.9965 |
0.7349 |
F2 |
0.9775 |
0.9050 |
0.9973 |
0.9939 |
0.7761 |
F3 |
0.9976 |
0.9257 |
0.9952 |
0.9984 |
0.9895 |
F4 |
0.9768 |
0.9170 |
0.9960 |
0.9958 |
0.7040 |
F5 |
0.9804 |
0.9176 |
0.9975 |
0.9964 |
0.7304 |
F6 |
0.9816 |
0.9125 |
0.9926 |
0.9937 |
0.9666 |
F7 |
0.9766 |
0.9171 |
0.9960 |
0.9958 |
0.7000 |
F8 |
0.9810 |
0.9044 |
0.9970 |
0.9936 |
0.8766 |
F9 |
0.9912 |
0.9150 |
0.9977 |
0.9963 |
0.9504 |
F10 |
0.9813 |
0.9207 |
0.9970 |
0.9966 |
0.7365 |
F11 |
0.9962 |
0.9261 |
0.9958 |
0.9984 |
0.9703 |
F12 |
0.9791 |
0.9070 |
0.9930 |
0.9929 |
0.9487 |
F13 |
0.9918 |
0.9163 |
0.9975 |
0.9966 |
0.9539 |
F14 |
0.9971 |
0.9209 |
0.9961 |
0.9976 |
0.9877 |
Figure 3 Drug release pattern of FI batch
Figure 4 Drug release pattern of F2 batch
Figure 5 Drug release pattern of F3 batch
Figure 6 Drug release pattern of F4 batch
Figure 7 Drug release pattern of F5 batch
Figure 8 Drug release pattern of F6 batch
Figure 9 Drug release pattern of F7 batch
Figure 10 Drug release pattern of F8 batch
Figure 11 Drug release pattern of F9 batch
Figure 12 Drug release pattern of F10 batch
Figure 13 Drug release pattern of F11 batch
Figure 14 Drug release pattern of F12 batch
Figure 15 Drug release pattern of F13 batch
Figure 16 Drug release pattern of F14 batch
Figure 17 Drug release pattern of final optimized formulation
5. DISCUSSION:
The in vitro dissolution study shows that the floating tablets are capable of drug release over a period of 12 hours. The study shows that the floating tablets absorbed the water and got swollen. Initially a barrier gel layer forms around the tablet and the interior of the tablet remains dry. The drug diffuses through this barrier gel layer gradually erodes with time and release the drug. The study also showed that the HPMC K 4 M enhances the drug release, such as F1, F4, F5, F7, F10 batches. These batches containing high percentage of HPMC K 4M shows higher drug release than other formulation batches in the respect of same time profile. On the other hand batches (F9, F11, F13) containing high percentage of HPMC K 15M shows retarded release of drug. However the batch F11 shows the in-vitro drug release pattern, which is very closer to the targeted release pattern. The floating lag time (FLT) is inversely proportional to the concentration NaHCO3 but the optimum floatability is obtained in the specified range of concentration of NaHCO3. The dissolution data are treated and analyzed to understand the kinetic and mechanism of the drug release from the floating matrix tablet. The treated data are fitted into various kinetic models and R2 values are evaluated. The analysis shows that the drug release from the floating matrix followed Higuchi release kinetics more preferably. As the “n” (release exponent) values of Krosmeyer- Pappes model of most of the formulation batch are in the range of 0.5 – 0.89 and 0.89- 1.0. So, t he release mechanism is non-fickian or anomalous transport leading to gradual erosion of matrix and to some extent Case- II transport mechanism. Comparing between Zero order and First order release pattern, Most of the formulation showed Zero order release than First order. So, release of drug from the formulationis is not concentration dependent, which is a principle criteria of an extended release dosage form.
6. CONCLUSION:
A floating extended release formulation of a broad-spectrum antibiotics have been prepared by a unique blend of polymer (HPMC) matrix, NaHCO3 (Sodium bicarbonate) and other excipients in a optimized ratio to achieve an extended or delayed drug release profile upto 12 hours without any chemical interaction between drug and excipients. A unique blend of polymer matrix has been made by two different grades (K4M-low viscosity and K15M-high viscosity) of 'hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose' (HPMC) in a optimized ratio of 1: 35.66 (HPMC K4M: HPMC K15M). to reach the targeted drug release profile (Table: 16) i.e, CPR2h(%), CPR4h(%), CPR8h(%), CPR12h(%) are respectively 15.00 %, 30.00 %, 60 % and 90 % are completely supported by the U.S.P guide line (U.S.P Edition- 2009, Volume: II, Pages: 1957, 1959 and 1961), NaHCO3 (Sodium bicarbonate) is used in the tablet formulation of Antibiotics as a floating agent. Where NaHCO3 helps to retain the tablet dosage form of Antibiotics by maintaining a optimized floating lag time (FLT) and total floating time (TFT) in the stomach, without disturbing the drug release profile. Other excipients such as citric acid and magnesium stearate are used in the formulation. Magnesium stearate is used as lubricant in optimum concentration which does not affect the desirable release of drug. A fixed concentration of citric acid is used to increase the floating ability of Sodium bicarbonate. The weight variation, content uniformity, thickness and hardness test and friability of the final optimized formulation are within the specified limit of U.S.P. On that basis by using optimized formulation, we can formulate the sustained release floating formulation.
7. REFERENCES:
1. Ponchel G, Irache JM. Specific and non-specific bioadhesive particulate system for oral delivery to the gastrointestinal tract. Adv Drug Del Rev. 1998; 34:191-219. PubMed DOI: 10.1016/S0169-409X (98)00040-4.
2. Lenaerts VM, Gurny R. Gastrointestinal Tract- Physiological variables affecting the performance of oral sustained release dosage forms. In: Lenaerts V, Gurny R, eds. Bioadhesive Drug Delivery System. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1990.
3. https://www.google.co.in/?gws_rd=cr and ei=iwOBUqrIDI2WrAfQ5oCwDA#q=mechanism+of+action+of+ciprofloxacin and
4. https://www.google.co.in/?gws_rd=cr and ei=iwOBUqrIDI2WrAfQ5oCwDA#q=mechanism+of+action+of+amoxicillin and
5. Davis SS, Stockwell AF, Taylor MJ, et al. The effect of density on the gastric emptying of single and multiple unit dosage forms. Pharm Res. 1986;3:208-213. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016334629169.
6. Urguhart J, Theeuwes F, Drug delivery system comprising a reservoir containing a plurality of tiny pills. US patent 4 434 153. February 28, 1994.
7. Mamajek RC, Moyer ES, Drug dispensing device and method. US Patent 4 207 890. June 17, 1980.
8. Groning R, Heun G. Oral dosage forms with controlled gastrointestinal transit. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1984; 10:527-539.
9. Groning R, Heun G. Dosage forms with controlled gastrointestinal passage—studies on the absorption of nitrofurantion. Int J Pharm. 1989; 56:111-116. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(89)90003.
10. Wu W, Zhou Q, Zhang HB, Ma GD, Fu CD. Studies on nimodipine sustained release tablet capable of floating on gastric fluids with prolonged gastric resident time. Yao Xue Xue Bao. 1997; 32:786-790. PubMed
Received on 01.07.2017 Modified on 09.09.2017
Accepted on 26.09.2017 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharm. Dosage Form. & Tech. 2017; 9(3): 123-130.
DOI: 10.5958/0975-4377.2017.00021.0